That's exactly what mine had. 9x2 shoes inside 9x2.5 drums. Just got replacement drums today, and they're 9x2.5 as well. So - would that mean to upgrade to 9x2.5, I'd just need bigger shoes? Maybe (or maybe not) bigger wheel cylinders? Not that I'd do it right now - my shoes have less than 60 miles on them - but that would be something to think about. On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Mike Kindle wrote: > > > > > The 65 232 I had, had 9x2" shoes inside a standard 9x2-1/2" drum. > > That means it also had different backing plates to go with the 2" shoes. > > I wound up replacing them with 2-1/2" backing plates and shoes but I thought it strange that they had > > downgraded in this way. It just meant there was a half inch of drum never being used. > > Maybe so they could call the full 2-1/2" setup heavy duty? > > > > I believe the 66 TSM referred to this option as 9x2". Describing brake shoes rather than the drums. > > It might have simply been that someone put the wrong drums on, > intentionally or otherwise... > > > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list