The 65 232 I had, had 9x2" shoes inside a standard 9x2-1/2" drum. That means it also had different backing plates to go with the 2" shoes. I wound up replacing them with 2-1/2" backing plates and shoes but I thought it strange that they had downgraded in this way. It just meant there was a half inch of drum never being used. Maybe so they could call the full 2-1/2" setup heavy duty? I believe the 66 TSM referred to this option as 9x2". Describing brake shoes rather than the drums. > The front drums for the '65 Rambler American 330 with 196 OHV engine > should be 9x2, shouldn't they? I read the TSM - says 9x2. I read the > Grand Unified Brake List, it says 9x2. Went to 2 different parts > stores and they're coming up with 9x2.5 > > So - if anyone knows offhand, is it 9x2 or 9x2.5? I didn't place the > order, and will probably measure inside depth to be sure - but if any > of you know offhand, could you confirm? > > _________________________________________________________________ Pack up or back up–use SkyDrive to transfer files or keep extra copies. Learn how. hthttp://www.windowslive.com/skydrive/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_skydrive_packup_042008 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080408/0d2cb0cc/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list