" From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx> " " " Tom, the only "problem" you might have is that the ports on the 70 " head should be much bigger than the later model ports. I know the " early 60s 199/232 has very large ports, not sure exactly when they " started getting smaller. Since the ports on the block are larger than " the ones on the intake it won't really be a problem at all. Once you " see the ports you might want to round the edges on the intake to " reduce turbulence, that's about it. Should work just fine. '72, with the advent of the bridged rocker setup; they shrank the ports by raising the floors and supposedly -gained- flow... and also supposedly the water jacket cores weren't changed, so there's a lot of metal under those ports. afaik this shape was carried until the 4.0. they continued making shaft rocker heads until '74 but i can't find out if they made the port shape switch in '72 also. all 199/232/258 heads had 56cc closed chambers '64-7, 66cc open '68-'76, 74cc open '77-'80. they shrank again during the '80s but i don't have data. pistons changed at the same times, except for a single 258-only slug used '80-'90. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list