My comments have stirred a few folks up, but to qualify a couple of things.... what upset me about the article was the "sudden deat" April fool ending. Yep... I admit it... I'd LOVE to see some kind of resurected AMC, but it's not going to happen. The article raised a dream, and popped the bubble. I was, in NO way referring to Frank's publication as a "small" thing. I love it, and admire him for taking the time to put it together. It's nice when mainstream mags talk glowingly of our chosen rides, and I'm sure we all appreciate it. There just seems to be so much negativity about them from the "Big 3" fans, even to this day, yet here the occasional AMC car cruises onto the field at the car show, causing more smiles and "my Dad had one of those" comments than any Falcon or Fury ever does. Sure, we're different. AMC was different. When everyone else was making drastic changes to their products, throwing money around like mints, AMC saved a bundle producing the same subframe with fresh skin, and keeping up with changing tastes. Clever. One more point AMC always got thrown at it was their use of proven parts, keeping R&D costs down. Another company has been doing that for generations... Rolls Royce. Last I knew, a Rolls used Camry disc pads! I don't hear anyone slamming THEM for using "proven parts" at a quarter of a million a copy. Just one AMCer's opinion. I'm proud to have been driving AMC since '65, and still doing so. I pull up to a music job in my Matador wagon, and heads still turn. Kinda neat. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080213/dc7c7447/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list