For HD use where getting to bolts isn't a problem I'd just get an inexpensive 1/2" drive beam type Craftsman torque wrench. Not sensitive to calibration! It's only as accurate as your eyesight on the dial, so it's in the ± 3 ft/lb range. That's what the factory mainly used, I believe, in the 50s and 60s (what else did they have, especially in the 50s and before?). Why not build an old-style car with an old-style (but not obsolete -- many still in use and sold today!) torque wrench? The next one I buy will be a beam type. I don't trust the old snap-on dial type (but no click, pull and watch the dial!) anymore even though it has been calibrated a couple times. I bought one of the cheap Chinese clickers (under $40) when I first built my stroker, but don't trust it much either. They are good at first (I compared to a friend's high dollar wrench, was within 1-2 ft/lbs every time), but to me it's about a throw-away after building an engine or two. I don't trust it to hold calibration over a long period of time, and it's eight years old now. -------------------- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:50:30 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Got the cash together for rebuilding the 63 Classic's 232, and I don't trust my old Craftsman torque wrench ... bought it new, but it's old now. Rather than attempt to have it calibrated (the pivot binds...) I wanna replace. Any suggesions? Proto micrometer-type around $150 list is about what I can afford. It'll be foot-pounds for general engine/chassis use. Snap-On is outa my range... and probably not called for since I don't use this every day. I hope to pull the motor in Feb and have it back in the car in a month (which probably means 6 - 8 weeks -- Frank Swygert Publisher, "American Motors Cars" Magazine (AMC) For all AMC enthusiasts http://farna.home.att.net/AMC.html (free download available!) _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list