Re: [Amc-list] Torque vs Re-Torque
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] Torque vs Re-Torque
- From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:21:49 -0800
-- Bruce Hevner <scramblr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you are using an old shop manual they are probably referring to the old
> asbestos sandwich type head gaskets. These DID need to be re-torqued at
> least a few times until they “bedded in”.
Ahh... the gasket I had was not one of those, thankfully. I remember those
things! The one I had was not one of the blue-coated sealing types but it
was a modern flat solid-composite or whatever.
Did 195.6 OHVs come with those, or did Nash erm AMC simply state the old
process every year?
> This is ONLY MY OPINION of what to do. I would ALWAYS call the gasket mfg
> and get their recommendation since it’s their product.
In fact, I will do that... I guess I was thinking that the re-torque thing
was in there for a reason OTHER than headgasket construction reasons. If
there's no reason to believe this motor has a particular problem with bolt
stretching/head shifting etc then Felpro would know. I think I still have
the box of gaskets so I can compare with the "modern' part number Joe gave
me and call 'em and ask.
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin