re: little car, modest low-speed boost > i don't see why not - it's only a matter of sizing the turbo to the > airflow, smaller at these low rpm than a 'screamer'. another point - > dynamic stress goes as the square of rpm; stock internals that can > take 140hp at 5000 can handle quite a lot of boost at 2500. That's what I was thinking. For this sort of car, light, a six, simple, low-stress components, ... OK cheap (Rambler Mentality! :-), 25 - 50 hp gain is a big deal. It makes for an interesting and more-fun car. It's not really about "saving money" though it does that. There's something about working within the bounds of a modest lightweight car that's really appealing to me, and I assume others that drive these things. Probably lost all the AMX fans! :-) > so you don't have a metric buttload of hp - torque is what moves your > car off the line. And I was just marvelling today, how I'm pulling in heavy traffic at 700rpm in 3rd gear at 15mph, what a nice machine it is to drive. I doubt even a small (tiny!) turbo would be pumping much at those flows. It's a very old-fashioned experience. To me this is the core of driving a half-century-old car. > imho you'd have to start thinking about that mopar 10" clutch with > that kind of hp... Well I guess this is one of those things you can actually predict and measure -- a clutch cares about torque, not RPM (up until balance etc matters). _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list