Andrew, Thank you, I'm sticking with my preferred setup. -- Mark Price Morgantown, WV 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 " I was different before people dared to be different" -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker) > " From: David Crooks <david.crooks@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > " > " I got to ask, why the fronts first? > " I'd rather hang the tail out then loose steering control.... > " > " -- > " Mark, > " I'm afraid you're the exception to the rule! > " Most people prefer the under steer of locking the front's first, > " rather than unexpectedly spinning during hard braking. Part of this > " may be past experience, as all the car companies bias the brakes > " 5-10% towards the front, but in my experience most people prefer to > " slide in a straight line, rather than doing a 180.... > > that's because your average appliance driver's brain locks up before > the brakes do. most of these people would really be happier with a > star trek transporter for getting around, never mind it kills you > every time you use it. > > tires can't brake and steer to the limit at the same time; maximum > traction is a product of the two. if you modulate the brakes around > the rear-lockup threshold and they lock first, you'll always have > steering margin. > > nb. when you're about to hit something large and immovable, doing a > 180 first could significantly reduce your injury chances. think about > it. > ________________________________________________________________________ > Andrew Hay the genius nature > internet rambler is to see what all have seen > adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list