Re: [Amc-list] California Smog Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Amc-list] California Smog Bill



Is indeed good news, for some reason the people in charge of this stuff look to california like it is the only sentient being on emmisions.
    Whatever Ca does the other emissions areas do one at a time over the next few years. It's like they don't know what to do and can't figure it out for themselves, so they just do as California does!
    I to like the no inspection we have here. Antiques have none at all, DD's have anual safety inspections though.

--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
" I was different before people dared to be different" 

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Kelly Hardie" <ramblinguy.kelly@xxxxxxxxx>
> I'm glad to hear it. I wrote several letters to my legislator when I lived
> in SoCal, I'm happy they  seem to have worked. Of course, I'm even happier
> to live where there are no inspections at all :)
> 
> Kelly
> 
> On 9/24/07, Nolanatcamelot@xxxxxxx <Nolanatcamelot@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Congratulations to all you California members who contacted  the
> > California
> > Senate Appropriations Committee about killing this bill.  But...watch out
> > for
> > next year. The Assembly member who introduced this bill will  likely try
> > again
> > next year.
> >
> > nolan dehner
> > Nor Cal AMCs
> > Windsor, Ca
> >
> >
> >
> > (
> > 
> http://echo.bluehornet.com/ct/ct.php?t=2097384&c=1097229081&m=m&type=1&h=9C66E05
> E3A03447C621AEE265670D6E1
> > )
> > _Click  here to view the newsletter as it was  printed._
> > (
> > 
> http://echo.bluehornet.com/ct/ct.php?t=2097385&c=1097229081&m=m&type=1&h=9C66E05
> E3A03447C621AEE265
> > 670D6E1)
> >
> > California Emissions  Testing Bill Dead For the Year
> > Enthusiasts Rally  to Defeat Legislation Requiring Annual Smog  Check
> > In a major victory for enthusiasts in  California, the Senate
> > Appropriations
> > Committee rejected  SAN-opposed legislation (AB 616) that threatened to
> > require  annual smog-check inspections for vehicles 15 years old
> > and  older. After
> > having been previously approved by the full  California Assembly and the
> > Senate
> > Transportation Committee,  the bill is dead for the year.
> > "Car clubs and individual hobbyists across the  state loudly and
> > forcefully
> > objected to passage of this bill,"  said SEMA Vice President of Government
> > Affairs Steve McDonald.  "Ultimately, the lawmakers in Sacramento heard
> > their
> > message."
> > Through thousands of phone calls and e-mails,  SAN members were able to
> > convince committee members that these  vehicles constitute a small portion
> > of the
> > overall vehicle  population and are a poor source from which to look for
> > emissions reduction.
> > In correspondence to his constituents, Senator  Dave Cox expressed his
> > opposition to the bill, "I have not yet  seen any evidence that
> > 15-year-old vehicles
> > pollute our air  substantially more than 14-year-old vehicles. Declaring
> > all
> > vehicles 15 years or older are guilty of being gross polluters  without
> > any
> > empirical data is backwards and does not reflect  the spirit of the law."
> > Of additional concern to the enthusiast  community were provisions in the
> > bill that would have required  that funds generated through the additional
> > inspection fees be  deposited into an account which could be used to scrap
> > older
> > cars. "We are especially indebted to those legislators who  opposed the
> > bill
> > because it would have placed an undue burden  upon car owners simply
> > because
> > their vehicle is older than an  arbitrary date set in law," McDonald
> > added.
> > The SAN would like to thank the countless  individuals and car clubs whose
> > dedication and persistence in  contacting lawmakers in Sacramento as this
> > bill
> > moved through  the legislative process. Special thanks to the Association
> > of
> > California Car Clubs for the coordinated effort by their  member clubs in
> > opposing this bill.
> > =====
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************** See what's new at
> > http://www.aol.com
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> > 
> http://www.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20070924/7d9f3b9d/attachm
> ent.htm
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: not available
> > Type: image/gif
> > Size: 17302 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > Url :
> > 
> http://www.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20070924/7d9f3b9d/attachm
> ent.gif
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amc-list mailing list
> > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://www.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20070927/675c463a/attachm
> ent.htm 
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list


Home Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin 


This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated