I'm glad to hear it. I wrote several letters to my legislator when I lived in SoCal, I'm happy they seem to have worked. Of course, I'm even happier to live where there are no inspections at all :) Kelly On 9/24/07, Nolanatcamelot@xxxxxxx <Nolanatcamelot@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Congratulations to all you California members who contacted the > California > Senate Appropriations Committee about killing this bill. But...watch out > for > next year. The Assembly member who introduced this bill will likely try > again > next year. > > nolan dehner > Nor Cal AMCs > Windsor, Ca > > > > ( > http://echo.bluehornet.com/ct/ct.php?t=2097384&c=1097229081&m=m&type=1&h=9C66E05E3A03447C621AEE265670D6E1 > ) > _Click here to view the newsletter as it was printed._ > ( > http://echo.bluehornet.com/ct/ct.php?t=2097385&c=1097229081&m=m&type=1&h=9C66E05E3A03447C621AEE265 > 670D6E1) > > California Emissions Testing Bill Dead For the Year > Enthusiasts Rally to Defeat Legislation Requiring Annual Smog Check > In a major victory for enthusiasts in California, the Senate > Appropriations > Committee rejected SAN-opposed legislation (AB 616) that threatened to > require annual smog-check inspections for vehicles 15 years old > and older. After > having been previously approved by the full California Assembly and the > Senate > Transportation Committee, the bill is dead for the year. > "Car clubs and individual hobbyists across the state loudly and > forcefully > objected to passage of this bill," said SEMA Vice President of Government > Affairs Steve McDonald. "Ultimately, the lawmakers in Sacramento heard > their > message." > Through thousands of phone calls and e-mails, SAN members were able to > convince committee members that these vehicles constitute a small portion > of the > overall vehicle population and are a poor source from which to look for > emissions reduction. > In correspondence to his constituents, Senator Dave Cox expressed his > opposition to the bill, "I have not yet seen any evidence that > 15-year-old vehicles > pollute our air substantially more than 14-year-old vehicles. Declaring > all > vehicles 15 years or older are guilty of being gross polluters without > any > empirical data is backwards and does not reflect the spirit of the law." > Of additional concern to the enthusiast community were provisions in the > bill that would have required that funds generated through the additional > inspection fees be deposited into an account which could be used to scrap > older > cars. "We are especially indebted to those legislators who opposed the > bill > because it would have placed an undue burden upon car owners simply > because > their vehicle is older than an arbitrary date set in law," McDonald > added. > The SAN would like to thank the countless individuals and car clubs whose > dedication and persistence in contacting lawmakers in Sacramento as this > bill > moved through the legislative process. Special thanks to the Association > of > California Car Clubs for the coordinated effort by their member clubs in > opposing this bill. > ===== > > > > > ************************************** See what's new at > http://www.aol.com > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20070924/7d9f3b9d/attachment.htm > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: image/gif > Size: 17302 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://www.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20070924/7d9f3b9d/attachment.gif > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20070927/675c463a/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list