" From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx> " " " That's not the first time an engine sharing deal was in effect -- " [] " I believe " (but can't verify) that the same thing happened with Studebaker " in Canada. GM was willing to supply Stude with engines to " continue Canadian production and help their engine plant numbers " along until the 1966 "AutoPact" between Canada and the US, " eliminating the need to produce engines in Canada i'm surprised. by my count, in the early '60s gm had not less than -8- different engine designs requiring separate production facilities in the us. i know in canada pontiacs came with chevy engines, but i'd think a market 1/10 the size of the us would still be plenty big. in the us, a small company like amc could afford to produce 2 different engine families. a big market, but they had a small slice, probably less than gm had in canada at that time. i think it was part of stude's general decline that it was cheaper to abandon their own engines, which were pretty nearly out of date by then, and buy chevies. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list