Re: [Amc-list] Synthetic vs Conventional
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] Synthetic vs Conventional
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 08:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
" From: David Crooks <david.crooks@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
"
"
" Engine break in: There's been a lot of stuff written about using
" conventional oil during the break in period. The counter point is that
" some of the most exotic motors come with synthetic from the factory...
they might be pre-broken-in. it's possible today to make engines that
require little break-in time, and they might be running them on test
stands before installing them in cars; lincoln did this back in the
early '60s - 2h on -every- 430, incl. 30m at full throttle. those
cars would regularly go 250000mi without touching the engihe. even
more remarkable considering the inattention they likely got and the
oils of the day.
" Personally, I believe it makes some economic sense to use conventional
" for the first couple of changes, when you're changing it on really short
" intervals, but if you've money to burn, I see no reason you couldn't use
" synthetic from day one.
i've heard that synthetics are too slippery to allow proper break-in
wear.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin