On Tue, 1 May 2007, Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I did some heavy reading of the first Saturn site you > posted and after thinking it over am sad to say, "I don't see > the point". Physics, physics, physics. No free lunch here. Toyota etc aren't stupid, but they are conservative. The hybrid can be made, supported as a product, and not kill them when smallish design things go wrong. The problem is largely that short-term economics isn't the way to look at transportation systems, the costs are not-in-the-vehicle, eg. pollution, waste, heat, accidents, insurance, quality of life, traffic, time wasted, junkyards, wonr tires, etc. But unfortunately you and I can't hardly influence those things so we get only to stick batteries in things like cars. The real solution is none-of-the-above, eg. urban transport systems, and save the car for weekends and fun and hauling. But for making something you could drive, the locomotive model sounds right to me: a battery packed sized only to provide capacity for some number of 0 - 60 accellerations, and a small but sizeable super-efficient dinosaur fueled constant-output generator to charge it. Flat and level 65mph the genset would provide cruise energy+recharge. When you park it would charge up; if you happened to be near an outlet you'd plug it in and the genset would shut off. I bet it would take 1/5th the batteries of a full-electric to pull that off. And THAT would be buildable. I could find my spreadsheet, but a 60mph car slowed to 0mph dumps 2 MEGAJOULES of energy in that much time. It's a LOT of energy just pissed literally into the wind as heat. That's just stupid. Multiply by every car on the road and it's embarrassing and criminal, but there's no electrical-generation/storage system on the planet that can input that much energy in such a short time. _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list