Re: [Amc-list] EFI install on [anything modest]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] EFI install on [anything modest]
- From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:16:53 +0000
Not sure this is exactly the same, but Dino over on the strokers group is in Saudi Arabia. He has an exprot 90's XJ. It runs off of MAP,coolant, etc; no O2 sensor on it at all.
I would imagine the ecu from it would allow running even leaded fuels without too much problem. He uses a map voltage adjuster and some other tricks to alter the fuel curve to go with its stroker and 24 lb Ford injectors.
--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
> " From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
> "
> " On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Sandwich Maker wrote:
> "
> " > " From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
> " > "
> " > " The only thing I've read "bad" about Howell and others is from
> " > " people who tried to set them up without enough sensor feedback,
> " > " "open loop", and feedback is the whole POINT of FI. Except for
> " > " those few, I've not heard a bad thing about Howell.
> " >
> " > i disagree about feedback. it's the only practical way to zero in on
> " > perfect mixture under widely and wildly changing conditions, but i've
> " > always thought that to a degree it was a crutch for systems that
> " > didn't have the proper sensors to read the environment going in.
> "
> " I was specifically referring to non-OEMs adding EFI to an
> " engine that's either older, modified, rebuilt, customized,
> " or otherwise not-factory-unit-to-unit consistent.
> "
> " Saab designed a limited feedback FI system for some particular
> " engine coming off an assembly line with probably good consistency
> " unit to unit. That's not what hobbyists are doing.
>
> agreed, though saab didn't design this system - it was the original
> bosch jetronic first seen on the '66 vw squareback. afaik it had -no-
> feedback.
>
> " Isn't it funny though, that a carb basically has one "sensor",
> " an air-velocity/partially-mass measuring device aka venturi, and
> " with that one crappy old thing meters gas pretty damn well over
> " a surprising range of variables. (OK power valves etc count.)
>
> don't forget 'booster' venturii!
>
> " Carbs are lousy at: engine (coolant) temperature compensation,
> " economy/partial throttle cruise vs. power "modes", and
> " altitude. Chokes and vacuum or progressive-mechanical secondaries
> " pick the low-hanging-fruit of the first two, and there's some
> " 80's carbs that attempt altitude but we don't hear about those
> " any more!
>
> this is all why a simple open-loop system like the jetronic worked so
> well. the only thing it couldn't measure was humidity.
>
> " > this was btw an
> " > analog system, based afaik on bendix patents that may have been on the
> " > '57 rebel system.
> "
> " It would be very interesting to re-visit those older analog
> " systems with the electronic gunk we have now! Too bad the
> " hardware is all museum quality and availability now. Analog
> " servo stuff is something I'm good at (useless skill).
>
> analog stuff can take real math skills which i think is why it's
> gotten passed over, but i think it's a shame. the elegant simplicity
> of it all...
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay the genius nature
> internet rambler is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin