Sounds like my American matches the Hornet ride. It has used V8 springs, Poly bushings everywhere except the struts, those are still rubber. The 205/60/15's at 32 PSI don't help any! The alck of carpetings also increases road noise. Shocks are low pressure gas. The next phase of work entails the new 2.95 first gear T5 Z pec trans and floor insulation and carpet. The floor will be getting coated with the Peel and stick stuff then standar carpt and pad.I expect those additions to make a big change in NVH! I know my full size Bronco really quieted down when I carpeted the rear area over the rubber mat. -- Mark Price markprice242ATadelphia.net Morgantown, WV ---- Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Swygert, Francis G MSgt 436 CES/CECM wrote: > > > John, on the 63-66 big cars I notice it when I hit a pot hole! You'd > > feel something like that even with new stock bushings, but there's a > > very pronounced jar with the urethane strut rod bushing. Feels like > > We're of course talking about really subjective, hard to measure > things, but while I think the half urethane/half rubber bushings > I run in the 63 Classic are a *bit* harsher, it's not serious, > and I definitely don't feel it in the floorboards (sic). > > The worst feature of the urethane is the infamous groaning, but > after a year or two they mostly shut up except at high curbs etc. > > In fact, the 63 Classic rides unbelieveably smoothly, for an > inexpensive car. There's no front sway bar so it... sways, > but this ain't no sports car, I don't mind, it suits the car > just fine. > > Don't you, Frank, have rack steering? Could be impulse energy > transmission that way, to the chassis. > > > > > Now my 70 Hornet, that's a rough cheap ride. It's 100% new as > stock (OK, 20K mi), stock springs +1" height, KYB shocks, stock > "heavy duty" sized tires (195/70-14) at 30psi, all rubber parts > except the famous John Elle spring tower fix w/urethane's. > > I don't think there's anything wrong with the car, but it > doesn't have any of the side-sill insulators or the later > iso-mount rear insulators. > > I think it's lighter than the 63 Classic by 200 - 300 lbs. (I > weighed the 63 Classic wagon on an actual scale: 3150 lbs. TSMs > etc talk about ICC-agreed-upon ship weight). Don't know what > the Hornet weighs, but I guess about 3000. > > Not sure exactly why the Hornet rides so rough. It handles fine > (as it could ever), has stock sway bar. You just feel and hear > rough roads. > > The 72, less-good suspension (new springs all around, but I > repair ball joints etc as they wear rather), rides the same; > good handling, no noises, solid, noisy and rough. > > _______________________________________________ > AMC-List mailing list > AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > > or go to http://www.amc-list.com _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com