Send AMC-List mailing list submissions to amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at amc-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of AMC-List digest..." Today's Topics: 1. (no subject) (francis.swygert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) 2. new cam in the Gremlin (Michael Bailey) 3. Re: new cam in the Gremlin (Jim Shadwick) 4. Re: AMC-List Digest, Vol 5, Issue 47 (Poncho7amx@xxxxxxx) 5. Re: Balance Valve Braking (Brien Tourville) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:03:12 -0000 From: <francis.swygert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [AMC-List] (no subject) To: <collinsmd3@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <8B4C911BEBA5E24888E353FF362B9E7702E65FC8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Mike, the small car (Hornet/Concord, Gremlin/Spirit, and 64-69 American) crossmember only interchanges on those cars. The Javelin uses the same cropssmember as big cars( 67-78 Rebel, Matador, Ambassador, and of course Javelin). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Collins" <collinsmd3@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <eddiestakes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:43 PM Subject: Re: Looking for a V8 crossmember > Do you know if the crossmembers that came out of a Gremlin, small AMC's, > Spirit, Hornet, Concord etc. will fit in a 68 javelin? I see these from > time to time, but just not sure if they are a true fit. > Any help and advice you could give would be greatly appreciated. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:38:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Bailey <route66rambler@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [AMC-List] new cam in the Gremlin To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20060624053842.36190.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Just got my 74 Gremlin up and running on Monday after the weekend thrash on the cam. Service limit on the timing chain is 1/4" deflection. It was closer to an inch. It was hard to measure, due to the deeply imprinted chain marks in the timing gears. All twelve lifters were worn concave. Pushrods and rocker arms showed very little wear, except one rocker arm. The bores still had a crosshatch from a rebore, and measurement showed .020 oversize. The presence of the honing marks and surprisingly great shape of the motor lead me to believe it was rebuilt within the last 5,000 miles. About a year, maybe two before I got the car a year ago. I believe they re-used the cam, lifters, and timing set. Extremely uneven wear on the cam lobes tells me that they did not order their components on removal. To wear out so prematurely would also imply that assembly lube was not used either. Fortunately the cam bearings were left alone and looked and measured perfect. They should show basically no wear at all since the cam actually rides on oil, not the bearing. After it was back together, I noticed on re-assembling the head that one of the rocker arm bolts was too long. I have a junk motor right now, and took a bolt from there, along with the rocker arm and its bearing, as both were great. Replaced the water pump, since it's summer in the desert, and not doing it is like tempting fate. Now the car is smooth, silent, and powerful. Traffic is a whole nother story now. Yes, I've been flogging Molly. And Molly likes it. mike __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 23:57:35 -0600 From: Jim Shadwick <idahoamx@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [AMC-List] new cam in the Gremlin To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <449CD44F.80103@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Congrats Mike....still waiting on some parts to get mine going again.....been a bit of a struggle...but I will get there... Jim -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.2/373 - Release Date: 6/22/2006 ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:05:45 EDT From: Poncho7amx@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [AMC-List] AMC-List Digest, Vol 5, Issue 47 To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <364.6c8013d.31ce4c59@xxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" right on john long live are amcs ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 06:34:00 -0400 From: "Brien Tourville" <hh7x@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [AMC-List] Balance Valve Braking To: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Cc: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <449CDCD8.29231.293C1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Thanks Tom ! I was trying to answer another listers question in a rush - I like your answer to their question much better ! Bt. On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 06:20 -0400, Brien Tourville wrote: > > > My question is about the plumbing of the brake lines. > Every AMC I see has the drivers front brake line > branched off before the line goes to the balance > valve. None of the proportioning valves balance brake pressure left to right; only forward to rear, so L-R braking isn't affected by the valave anyways, and for all practical purposes, line length in (say) the front system doesn't matter; master cyl pressure equalizes left-to-right even with different length lines. And a lot of the valvey-looking blocks on the lower firewall in AMC cars are not proportioning valves; they are only brake-failure-light switches, that look for a big difference in pressure front-to-rear and make that dashlight come on. Some have prop. valves, some don't, depending on application. Brien Tourville NEW YORK ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list End of AMC-List Digest, Vol 5, Issue 48 ***************************************