" From: "John Elle" <johnelle@xxxxxxxxx> " " Andrew and all " SNIP " imho the duster [dart] rear would be too narrow for an amx - almost the " same as the american - and the years they used the 8.75" still had the " 5x4" bolt circle, so you'd have to handle that too. iirc a late '60s " midsize like a satellite would have a better width, and already 5x4.5" " though lh thd one side. " SNIP " Actually I do not know what width a 62 Classic rear end is or whether it " is coils or leaf springs back there but if it is of the narrower type " and A body rear end will work while a B body works well in a Javelin, " AMX configuration. Also I believe the later A bodies used 5x4.5 bolt " pattern. yes; '74-6. but the last year a-bodies had the 8 3/4" was '71. just checked an old c&d - '65 a-body, 55.5" track; b-body, 58.5". '65 classic - 57.5". " In both case it is an option that is available and the MOPAR 8 " ¾ has a good reliability reputation. In addition I believe the after " market also addresses the bolt pattern problem. i agree. this must be a common issue. " But also as others have pointed " out the newer Ford 9 inch assemblies with the wider option of factory " rear disc brakes might even be a better option. Point is, 4 wheel disc " brakes are a do-able deal on something as improbable as a 62 classic " using almost all junk yard parts if you are so inclined and it could be " a really interesting finished product when it is all said and done. definitely! and the junkyard challenge just makes it all the sweeter. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________ AMC-List mailing list AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wps.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list or go to http://www.amc-list.com