A: More like a design flop! Even I had trouble getting my Eagle's plastic cover to stop bleeding all over the place! (I redrilled the holes and fixed the way the aftermarket used cover I got mounted and even with black silicone I STILL had minor weepage at freeway speed!) Ford and Chev have been having major probs due to the same junk design. Ford is paying million$ to cure the 4.6L plastic intake problems. From: farna@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: AMC I-6 Oil weapage / leakage / seepage To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <ADVANCES62ZbLAX3cf3000001cf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I wouldn't exactly call it a "design flaw", though I know the plastic valve cover is much hated. It will warp over time, but the cars/engines were made to last around 10 years with few problems. That being the general design criteria, I'd say they met that. Most didn't start to leak until 15-20 years old. The last AMC car made was the 88 Eagle, it's 14 years old (but doesn't it use an aluminum valve cover?). A lot of the leaks are caused by people reinstalling too. The plastic valve covers really need to be snugged up but very little torque on the bolts. To much uneven pressure around it and it will always warp. Surfaces need to be squeaky clean before applying sealant too. It worked well, but I don't have an inch-pound torque wrench, and most mechanics wouldn't take the time on a valve cover unless they already knew it was a problem area. SO I agree with you in one respect -- it wasn't the brightest idea in the long run, but I wouldn't say it's a design flaw from an enginee! ring standpoint. On October 18, 2004 Brien Tourville wrote: > These engines ran a plastic valve cover that > was a failure the day it was installed. > > AMC removed using a few of the bolts - why > I'll never know - which allows the plastic to > 'bulge' - allowing the gasket to fail in areas. > > The aging plastic warps - adding to the number > of gasket failures. > > There have been a number of engine fires > due to these Design Flaws.