RE: [BaadAssGremlins] Re: One more rant on SpeedTV's Muscle Car challeng
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [BaadAssGremlins] Re: One more rant on SpeedTV's Muscle Car challenge
- From: "John W Rosa" <JohnRosa@xxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:04:22 -0400
Hmm....that's interesting. But then, I'm no engine
builder. I may have the explanation stored goofy in
the noggin. Others will better know what I was
trying to say.
Perhaps those being GROSS numbers, the parity changes
when they go NET (installed in the car)? Just guessing
there.
Nothing to do with bias....just can't give a proper
explanation of the difference.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: ndaracer1975 [mailto:ndaracer1975@xxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:18 PM
To: BaadAssGremlins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [BaadAssGremlins] Re: One more rant on SpeedTV's Muscle Car
challenge
70 390 325 hp @ 5000 420 ftlbs tq @ 3200
69 396 325 hp @ 4800 410 ftlbs tq @ 3200
yep, big dif. As for the coulda woulda shouldas of AMC building a big
block and embarassing the world, that's sounding like Bilwin. It's
nice people love their AMCs, I love mine, but the bias just gets
rediculous.
--- In BaadAssGremlins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "John W Rosa" <JohnRosa@xxxx>
wrote:
Big difference, dude.
Yahoo! Groups Links
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin