Re: [AMC-list] Six Cylinder Balancers

[Ken Ames <ameskg@xxxxxxxxx>]

hunderds of thousands of miles and haven't needed a cam button yet. 
: )

Ken

Quoting Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 
> If you haven't done so, I would score a timing cover from a 4.0L and a newer
> 4.2L balancer with the PS pulley already built in. Running the 4.0L cam
> button will eliminate a LOT of AMC 6 issues down the road.
> 
> 
> From: Joe Fulton <piper_pa20@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [AMC-list] Six Cylinder Balancers
> Message-ID: <523435.42003.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>  
> I'm putting together a rebuilt long block 232 for my 76 Gremlin.??The long
> block 
> is a factory rebuilt 1972 version.? ?I need to use the late 70s/early 80s 
> version of the crankshaft balancer (thick balancer) instead of the skinny 
> 60s/early 70s balancer because I'm using the 76 timing cover.? I'm using the
> 76 
> balancer in order to get the belt alignment where it needs to be (out in
> front 
> of that electronic probe fixture on the time cover).? If you've put together
> 
> many six cylinder motors you may know what I"m talking about.
>  
> So my question:? As far as the function of the balancer, any six cylinder 
> balancer will work right??? I know?an inline six cylinder engine is 
> basically?balanced by it's very nature.? 
>  
>  
> Joe Fulton 		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> AMC-list mailing list
> AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
> 


_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com