Re: [Amc-list] modern six in an old-six hole

[Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx]

silly me, I knew that about the 250, I forgot!
May be a good choice! but, it's a ford motor, ewe...

--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
" I realize that death is inevitable.
I just don't want to be around when it happens! "

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
> " From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
> " 
> " 
> " IIRC, Frank allready measured the 250-300 out and they are too long.
> 
> the 250 is a tall deck version of the 200 and not related to the 240
> which is a destroked 300 using different crank, rods, and pistons.
> 
> i can well believe the 240/300 is too long; it was built to be a truck
> motor and only used in cars briefly in the late '60s.  it is also btw
> considered along with the amc six to be one of detroit's most rugged,
> reliable, and long-lived postwar engines.
> 
> not sure if the 250 was ever used with the t96 but the smaller ford
> sixes appear to have been, from their beginning until ~'66-7.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay                                  the genius nature
> internet rambler                            is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list