Re: [Amc-list] Amc-list Digest, Vol 12, Issue 20

["Dan Strohl" <DStrohl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Armand-
Mostly, but we've been beefing up the tech and modified content lately.
Still gotta keep a lotta original content to keep our core readership
happy, but advertisers love to see the modified content too.

As for AMC performance, I'm working on another installment in Project
HMX (remember that? Yeah...), regarding that stroker 4.6L I've been
building.

dan 




Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:07:51 -0600
From: "Armand Eshleman" <aje1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] CC Rambler
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <001301c83daa$b2472200$6601a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"

Joe,

Yeah you're probably correct in your statements. It is kinda cool
though,
that Glad is getting almost 700 hp out of that cast crank.
Heck this motor is probably already in pieces on the dyno floor. I hate
to
be negative about it, but then of course, when he does abuse the
daylights
out of it and it shucks it's noogies for him, all the nay sayers will be
harping about that AMC "junk" again. No one but us ramblers will
remember
that the crank should have let loose long ago like a Ford or GM cast
crank
would have.

Did AMC cast cranks from high nickel content iron like with the blocks??
Is that why the crank is taking 700 hp??

Sad part of it is this is the only publication that is really main
stream
that puts in any AMC stuff when it comes to performance. I guess some
jeep
publications probably do, I know Hemmings Muscle Machines does too, but
isn't their stuff mostly original??

Armand




_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list