" From: "Larry R. Daum" <mramc@xxxxxxxxxxx> " " " " " The V-6 Buicks that ran Indy for time were also " very but never seemed to hold together much like the AMC Indy V-8 " unfortunately. i don't recall the buicks but i do remember the very high profile penske/chevy v6 effort. the cars were rocketships all month and easily swept the front row, and looked like they'd lap the field before the race ended, but none of them lasted longer than 50 miles. post-race analysis: crankshaft flex wiped the center mains out. but they were balanced, right? of course they were balanced, but like most crank balance jobs they were balanced as a unit. this lets an unbalance at one point counter an opposing unbalance at another point, and works if you assume the crank is infinitely stiff. this is adequate at street rpms, but real cranks aren't infinitely stiff and those v6 cranks bent like cooked spaghetti under the unbalance forces pulling them in different directions. they should've balanced each throw independently, as if it were the only one, with counterweights on each side. that runs the crank weight and rotating inertia up, but the other approach didn't work did it... i saw a bmw six in for rebuilding last year, at my friend's engine shop. 12 counterweights. fully machined too. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought