" From: farna@xxxxxxx " " On December 1, 2005 andrew hay wrote: " " > true - up to '94. yes, believe it or not, in '94-5 gm used " > ford-pattern t5s! on s-10s and camaros, though the camaro bell tips " > the tranny toward the driver, 15* iirc. " > " > dunno about input shaft lengths. they might still be chevy, quite a " > bit shorter than ford or amc. " " I thought the Chevy input was longer than the AMC/Ford? At least than " the six cylinder. I was thinking the Chevy input was closer to the AMC " V-8 input length. If I'm wrong please just post something again -- I've " never seen them side by side. I know the Ford will fit, so never " bothered with the Chevy. the gm definitely is not close to the amc v8 length. i have an amc t-10 and bell in my basement, and also a camaro t10u. the bell is the 'mexican' one that fits pre-'72 sixes, and oddly it has meat in the right places for a gm bolt pattern -- but it's -way- too deep for the gm input. the amc fits fine. advance adapters measures both the gm and ford as 6.5", but jeep [t5] as 7.19". i'm not sure they're measuring consistently... a long thread at jeeps-offroad.com on 'engine swap adapters' has this http://www.jeeps-offroad.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=920 pic. that's a '95 s10 2.2 bell on the right, an amc/jeep 2.5 bell on the left. they sure look the same depth, and greg doesn't comment on it. this http://www.jeeps-offroad.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3257 is the earlier s-10 bell, with the usual gm tranny pattern. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought