Re: the Navarro Rambler Six...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the Navarro Rambler Six...



The problem with a std trans and rear is overall length. The transaxle used in the indy car was very short, from "bellhousing" to centerline of axle -- like a VW beetle setup. I don't think you could practically make a driveline that was under 60 - 70" from harmonic balancer to axle centerline. Put the driver and "stuff" (cage for your damned ankles, fuel tank, battery, etc) in front of you (hmm...) and the wheelbase is loooong.

That rambler six is a long block!

I can dream up exotica, but when push comes to shove I gotta buy it and I gotta build it.

I wish I had walked into that auction with enough $$$ to have bought the transaxle! Oh man would that have made a fun car...




On Nov 15, 2005, at 4:32 AM, farna@xxxxxxx wrote:


You can run it mid engine with a standard axle. The indy car had an independent axle, but even that's not to difficult these days! The only ones that would look "period" behind it is a Jag or Corvette axle, but even a 280Z/ZX axle should be sufficient. The tires will break loose before the axle gives up. The Halibrand IRS setup was similar to a Jag. Standard Halibrand quick change center with very short "stub" axles right up against the case, drive shafts out to hubs that were on control arms. The big difference in the Jag and Corvette setups is the springs -- Jag uses four coil overs that require mounts out near the wheels, the 'vette uses a leaf spring mounted on the cast diff cover. So the 'vette is a bit easier to mount.

I've seen a really old mid engine car (something built in the 50s or early 60s) that used a standard rear axle about 6" from the transmission. The engine and axle were mounted on a sub frame, axle welded to it, which pivoted in front and had a transverse leaf spring in the back. Needless to say it wouldn't have rode good with all that unsprung weight, but it worked good enough that the guy had some fun with it anyway!


On November 15, 2005 Tom Jennings wrote:


It's not forgotten -- I stare at it nearly every day, making me feel
guilty for not continuing the documentation.

Randy Guynn was kind enough totake the custom, one-of-a-kind Navarro
six camshaft and profile it. I've had the specs for months now, too !
@#@!!#$@ busy to do ANYTHING on projects 'til recently. I'm entering
it into a spreadsheet to make a nice table, will post it and mail the
URL to the list.


(I'm thinking now that the only decent project to use that motor would be a hot rod, something 50's-ish with a track nose. I doubt I could ever afford a Hallibrand rear to make a mid-engine car like it ought to be, putting the turbo intake behind the drivers left ear :-)


=============================================================
Posted by wixList Archiver -- http://www.amxfiles.com/wixlist













Home Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin 


This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated