I agree with Tom -- I want something that works first. The problem is that most drivers in the US won't wear belts unless they are somewhat comfortable. The "fast pull/shock locking" belts are the best compromise -- they allow easy movement until they are extended fast or there is a sudden stop. That they aren't relatively tight to begin with is why people get bruises across their chest where the belt was -- slamming into the belts. Tight belts would leave less bruising anyway, maybe not none. I think your car has a good mix/compromise in the style Tom. A 60s rally car would probably have a very spartan interior at best! Not something you'd like every day. If I build the 62 American roadster I've been considering it will have a spartan 60s rally interior! Lately I've been thinking about building a dragster from that car though. That Chevy powered 63 wheel stander I had in AIM a few issues ago got me thinking about duplicating it, except using a 287/327 with dual turbos in the rear seat foot wells (which would be cut out and "flipped", leaving a cavity UNDER the floor for the turbos). Would be interesting... but then I'm not really into drag racing -- It would just be something I would build, play with a season or two, then sell. On November 8, 2005 Tom Jennings wrote: > Hear hear! I want functional. I'm building a SOLO II car, with 60's > rally style mixed with contemporary 'import scene' interior. I might > even auto-cross again with it, maybe next year. I'll probably end up > in some screwball class, but what the hell, it's fun anyways. > > > > On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:33 AM, <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Well lets say functional but not comfortable. Last time I heard > > anything about belts (when the Corvette 'cinch' motors were > > introduced to tighten belts for spirited driving) comfortable belts > > are not the safest belts. I will agree people (in the USA?) will > > only use the comfortable belts. Reminds me of something I read > > about brakes; in Europe people don't care if the brakes are noisy > > as long as they stop well, in the United States we don't care if > > they don't stop well as long as they are quiet! Present company > > excluded I am sure. > > > > > > > > Peter Marano > > > > Kenosha WI > > > > > > > >> Message-Id: <47B56B4A-9290-43EB-B9C7-093449BD1536@xxxxxxx> > >> To: AMC List <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> > >> Subject: seat belts! > >> Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 19:13:01 -0800 > >> > >> I finally got my seatbelts rebuilt, in my 1970 Hornet. Seatbelt > >> technology and fashion aren't a specialty of mine, but I think 1970 > >> is unique (a lot in the 1970 Hornet is unique to that car; many > >> things are totally different from 1971-up). > >> > >> It's certainly an early attempt to figure out how to make a > >> functional shoulder belt -- and not successful one! The lap belt is > >> ordinary enough, the outside end has a retractor in a plastic tube, > >> the inside is fixed with a plastic tube that pokes through the seat. > >> > >> The shoulder belt is the kicker -- it's fixed to the roof behind your > >> head, does not retract, and has a primitive clip and socket behind > >> the plastic trim with which to afix the mess when you're not using it > >> (which will be most of the time for most people, it's so annoying). > >> The business end has a little tang that fits into a keyhole in the > >> lap belt. It all looks very experimental. And since it's fixed, and > >> not inertial, when it's adjusted reasonably you are essentially > >> webbed tight to the seat, you can't even lean forward. > >> > >> The whole contraption cracks me up. The shoulder belt is so > >> impractical and hard to use! I love old cars! > >> > >> > >> I had to have all the webbing replaced; since the shoulder belt > >> doesn't retract, it's out in the sun, and they're all bleached and > >> frayed. I steel-wooled all the chrome parts, wrinkle-painted the > >> painted buckles (not correct, but not a concern of mine). > >> > >> That's all, just a reminder of the past, and improvements actually > >> made over time! > >> > > > > > > > > > > ============================================================= Posted by wixList Archiver -- http://www.amxfiles.com/wixlist