 
Re: RE Word Hydrogen vs Hybrid
     
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE Word Hydrogen vs Hybrid
- From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Bill Strobel wrote:
 Hydrogen cars will not
reduce our dependence on Middle East oil as current
technology has us cracking oil and natural gas for the
hydrogen.  Don't even fall for the myth of making
hydrogen from water, the energy needed to do it is
more than the work received from the resultant
hydrogen.
Thanks for pointing this out. The system cost of H2 is not less
than other systems (eg. oil --> gasoline).
It's possible that some cheaper way to split water will be found,
but it's not that likely -- pure physics is the limiting problem
-- the oxygen::hydrogen atomic bond has a known and absolutely
invariant binding energy. Whether it's chemical or electrical, you
have to overcome that bond, it's a bunch of electron-volts per
molecule, and that's that.  Facks is facks.
There's this idea that "conservation" means "giving up". It's
silly.  Using less is smart, not some commie plot to deprive us of
pleasure.
 Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin
 Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin