was Re: SR-4/T-5 Yoke?

["Ian Cudmore" <yahootoo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

'Mornin' guys

I currently have the 232/904 setup in my gremlin. Recently i was given a 71 
gremlin standard (3 on the tree?) now the 71 grem is rusted to crap, it was 
stuck instide a black berry bramble here on the left coast for the last 12 
years without ever being run. most of this car seems like its garbage, 
except maybe some of the interior peices, they might be able to be cleaned 
up, but what interests me is the bellhouseing. i seem to recall people 
saying that all the manual bells were the same? and i KNOW i've heard people 
talk about a T-5 being almost a bolt in. will this work? i plan to put in a 
4.7L stroker, a standard trans behind it would be even better. what other 
parts would i need? and what 'exactly' is the diffeence between a Furd and 
an AMC T-5? obviously overall leangth, but possibly the input splines as 
well? and if so is is easier to keep the tranny the same and modify the 
input? i know t-5 parts are common...


From: Armand Eshleman <aje1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: SR-4/T-5 Yoke?
Sent: July 20, 2005 5:04:41 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0 Just to let you know Joe, the shaft from the Mustang, the 
shaft
from the 79 AMX and the original shaft in the Javelin were all
too short to install behind the WC T-5 in my Javelin. I had to
have a shaft made. It did help to have the haft ends when I went
to the fabricator.
Armand


Joe wrote......
So I may go get that driveshaft after all.

Thanks,

Joe Fulton