Re: V6 This
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: V6 This
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 01:04:03 -0400 (EDT)
" From: Brien <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
"
"
"
"
" Subject: mail Digest for 7 Apr 2005 in hour 0:00
"
"
" the other stuff, a 3.1
" or 3.4L would require a balanced flexplate/flywheel. The 2.8L one is
" externally balanced till almost the end of the line.
"
" as i hear it all the 60-deg engines were redesigned to be
" neutral-balanced about '87-8, 2.8 included. it continued on to '93
" in
" s-10s, and i think this flywheel would be your ticket if you wanted
" to replace your manual-trans xj 2.8 with the gm crate 3.4 longblock,
" which is only available with a [700r4] flexplate.
"
" ----------------------------------------------------------------------
"
"
" Would the Olds 2001 Aurora V6 bolt in ?
that's the 'shortstar' [3/4 northstar] right?
afaik most/all gm engines since the '80s have the little chevy v6
pattern, so in theory they should bolt in, -but-
1. dunno the flexplate/flywheel situation.
2. starter location. in the northstar it's in the valley between
cylinder banks.
otoh i've also just learned that as of the mid-'90s -gm- was using
-ford- cased t5s! this was in a long, info-packed thread on
jeeps-offroad.com started by 'greg55_99'. and isuzu has a converter
housing that'll match the gm bolt pattern to the aw4 - though '87-'93?
4-cyl xjs do too.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin