Low range is what - 2:1? That would make the 2.73s more like 5.46s. My 'new' 85 Eagle wagon has the T5 5speed. 5th is a .76 overdrive making my 2.73s like 2.07:1. I wonder why the factory didn't move up to 3.08 diffs. That would still be 2.34 in overdrive. I have an 80 sedan with 3.08s and I'm thinking about a swap. Ken Ames 39Master85w.partscar,67Marlin,68AMX,70Machine,73Matador2drht,73Hornet4dsd, 73-74-75-76GremlinXs,75PacerX,76Hornet2dsd,77Matadorcpe,2-77AMXs,78AMX, 78Gremlin,78GremlinGT,79Concordhb,79PacerDL8,2-79AMXs,2-80AMXs, 2-80SpiritDL,80Eagle4dsdn,2-81SX4s,81SpiritGT,81Concord4dsd,82Eaglesw, 2-85Eaglesw,80J20,85J10,85Sentrasw (38) AMCA = http://clubs.hemmings.com/amcalberta/ Quoting Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > " From: Jesse <j2sax@xxxxxxxxx> > " > " So, I have been thinking again about my Eagle > " Projects. My Kammster is going to be the real > " offroader with custom (ie, heavier Sq tube) bumpers, > " brush guard, some panel protection, 258 (with a > " stroked 4.0 later), T5 trans, 209 TC (2 spd), 3.54 > " gears, sligth lift and larger tires. Should be pretty > " fun... > " > " The SX4 I am building for my son will be a 258 4 spd > " with 2 spd 219 TC but basically stock... for now > " anyway! Do you think with the low range capabilities > " of the 219 (or maybe 229) that I should leave the > " stock gearing alone... I believe they are 2.73's? > " > " I was going to swipe the 3.54 gears from a 4 cyl SX4, > " but now that I think about it, since the tires are > " going to be essentially stock, I bet the low speed > " capability of the 219 should be sufficient for trail > " running, mild hillclimbing and the few snows we might > " have out here. Opinions? > > i think stock gears would be fine. i suspect the low range would be > nearly useless otherwise. > ________________________________________________________________________ > Andrew Hay the genius nature > internet rambler is to see what all have seen > > adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought > > > >