Re: AMC Ink--Hemmings

["Jeff Reeves" <jeffr@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I made a point of telling them that, too. I told him about all the Gen
II/III V8s being externally identical, so if they didn't make the
distinction, it wasn't for lack of information. 
I have yet to read the article or get my hands on that copy, so I'm still
eager to read it all.

Jeff Reeves
Auburn GA
79 Spirit GT
72 Javelin SST
69 Ambassador DPL


To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 18:58:34 -0600
Subject: Re: AMC INK--Hemmings
Message-ID: <20050201.185834.-88465775.0.NAMDRA@xxxxxxxx>
From: Jock J Jocewicz <namdra@xxxxxxxx>

Jeff.
  I also have helped out Jim Donnelly at HMM. I think HMM is really a great
magazine for AMC enthusiasts and any musclecar enthusiasts. One thing about
their Big Block article is that there is a bone of contention among AMC'ers
if the 390-401 should be classified as a big block seeing that the 290 thru
401 (last AMC V8 editions) were all based on the same block, just bored and
stroked differently. It is hard to say that a 290, 304, etc. are big blocks.

Jock Jocewicz - President/Editor NAMDRA     NAMDRA@xxxxxxxx
8537 Antioch Rd., Salem, WI 53168 (262) 843-4326
http://www.namdra.org    JOIN NAMDRA, the best AMC club around!!!

AMO#19, NAMDRA#46, AMCRC#974, AMCWC (Honorary), NHRA#41915, IHRA#6766