Verizon Mail - Part 2 -
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Verizon Mail - Part 2 -
- From:
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 22:37:34 -0500
. He forwarded us a prepared statement (republished below).
According to Vincenzo, spam complaints come from spammers
themselves. This sits at odds with our own correspondence from
Verizon subscribers.
Alan Gottlieb's email is typical in expressing frustration over
Verizon's own subscribers (or former subscribers) over the email
blockade.
I read this article and it is unbelievable. I called Verizon to
confirm this and they did. In consolation, they said I could build a
list of domains to be permitted access. I have dozens of
international contacts and am not about to go through this chore
and I expect the reaction of many of their users will be the same...
bail out!! As soon as I confirmed this, I called COMCAST. They will
be installing tomorrow.
I wonder how many people are going to get fired over this
decision.
Expat lawyer Alberto Costa reports similar problems
I am a British lawyer resident in Boston. I have been affected by
this nonsense Verizon policy. Even British government email
accounts were blocked and my contacts there were unable to
correspond with me. The Verizon netmail complaints department
agreed with me and urged me to report the matter to the media.
I wrote to the Verizon CEO, Ivan Seidenburg, all members of the
Board of Directors and some Executive VP's. To date, I have not
received a response from any.
I will be closing my telephone, DSL and verizon netmail
account at expense to me (changing business cards etc.) and
moving to another provider.
I am astounded at Verizon's arrogance and blatant breach of its
own well published purported "codes of business conduct" which
stipulate, inter alia, their respect and integrity towards their
clients. At no stage was I informed of this email block and thus
was not given the chance to communicate with members of the
British government etc, by other means.
Thank you for your article and bringing this silly policy to the
attention of other readers, whom I hope will also terminate their
contracts with Verizon.
Ed Lowitz has a practical suggestion
I've lost e-mail as a result of this. To overcome it and possible
future problems of its ilk, I've taken to enclosing my Yahoo e-mail
address in my signature.
®
STATEMENT FROM VERIZON ONLINE REGARDING SPAM
FILTERING January 12, 2005
Spam is out of control. Leading providers of spam protection
tools such as MX Logic, Inc. and MessageLabs report that some
80 to 90 percent of all e-mail today is spam.
This is a major problem for Internet users in multiple ways.
Spam clogs our mailboxes daily to the point where it threatens
viability of e-mail as a communications tool. It also routinely
carries viruses, identity-theft scams, spyware, zombie bots and
other serious security threats.
As an ISP, Verizon Online is working hard to address these
serious security threats on the Internet by closely monitoring our
network for incoming and outgoing spam and by working
cooperatively with others across the ISP industry on anti-spam
initiatives.
These round-the-clock efforts include blocking spam and
propagation of viruses from sources we identify using methods
that are consistent with industry practices. This is a long-standing
policy at Verizon Online.
When we identify sources of spam or viruses, we block them as
narrowly as we can and, where possible, we work directly with
whoever manages that source to notify them of the issue. We then
continuously monitor the source and will lift the block as soon as
we are satisfied the threat has been resolved. In many cases, this
is resolved within two days; however, we will not remove a block
as long as a serious threat remains.
The entire ISP industry is working to combat spam and other
online security threats. Verizon Online is a member of various
coalitions, including the Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group
that includes both large and small ISPs covering more than 100
million online subscribers. We also have aggressively pursued
spammers through legal action, and taken a leading role in
drafting legislation at the state and national level and working with
domestic and international law enforcement agencies to combat
spam other threats. In short, Verizon is committed to protecting its
customers and its network from the serious security matters that
threaten our use of the Internet everyday.
Any spam blocking method will, inevitably, also result in the
blocking or delay of otherwise legitimate email. This is yet another
reason why spammers are harmful to the Internet community. If a
Verizon Online customer believes they are not receiving legitimate
e-mail, they should call our technical support desk for assistance
and we will work with them to resolve their situation as quickly as
possible. Our Verizon Online web site also features an Internet
security page with practical tips and tools that can help customers
protect themselves from Internet threats. It can be found at
http://broadbandbeat.verizon.net/safety_security.
We believe that fighting spam is the right thing to do for the
safety and security of our more than 4 million broadband and dial-
up customers.
Some of the loudest complaints you will see or hear about spam
blocking come from the spammers themselves, who lose
significant income when their efforts to flood the Internet with
unsolicited e-mail are foiled. Our customers expect and demand
that we provide them with as safe, secure and effective an Internet
experience as possible and we are firm in our commitment to do
that.
Related stories
Verizon persists with European email blockade
German court rules email blocking 'illegal'
Verizon and Yahoo! forge broadband alliance
Readers storm Verizon email blockade
Brien.
NEW YORK
eagle registry #501
eagle kammback registry
--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 1/19/2005
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin