Re: m9issing names and addresses

heck no, we asre all seeing it that way. what the heck happened?

Jay
----- Original Message ----- 
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: m9issing names and addresses


> No, I'm continuing to get blank headers as well.  I'm about to go to 
> digest
> mode or unsub for a while as it gets quite annoying.
>
> John
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:04 AM
> Subject: RE: m9issing names and addresses
>
>
>> Am I the only one that stopped getting any header info a couple weeks
>> ago?????????
>>
>> Hey Colin, you still the list administrator?
>>
>> Todd Jesme
>> MN
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>> Sent: None
>> Subject: m9issing names and addresses
>>
>> Todd if you are saying that you are not getting the information when the
>> list is emailed to you, I think it might be be something other than the
>> format. As I said in my email to you ,I'm getting all the names and
>> addresses. The following are just some examples
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> From: "Todd Jesme" <jesme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: 1969 Rambler 440, SW
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:59:52 -0600
>> Message-ID: <NKEJKAHLGJLPICPKNNKMKEAHCOAA.jesme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Yup, I used to file mine the same, but a couple weekends ago, I stopped
>> receiving ANY header information on list e-mails. The following headers
> have
>> NO infomation and are completely blank:
>>
>> From: "Ralph Bade" <rbade@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Flathead engine for sale
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:23:42 -0600
>> ran across this add in a local paper: '51 Willi Flat Head Ford V8.
>>
>> From: "Jim Blair" <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "amc" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: Old Films
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 19:32:53 -0800
>>
>>     1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx    www.BillAllen.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>