Re: [Amc-list] My Two Cents on Hydrogen etc
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] My Two Cents on Hydrogen etc
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:40:40 -0400 (EDT)
" From: Archimedes <Freedom@xxxxxxxx>
"
"
" adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker) said:
"
" []
"
" I'm not sure sequestering carbon is all it's baked up to be.
"
" Hmmm.... No pun intended.
"
" Atmospheric carbon levels (except since ~ 1700's) have fallen to such
" a low level that plant suffocation may not be far off the radar.
" During the history of life on earth, atmospheric CO2 has been in
" concentrations between 500-4000 ppm; whereas now it's down to around
" ~300 ppm; and the long-term trend is still towards decline. At ~250
" ppm, some plants start dying off; and every shedding of a few thousand
" more ppm's means more varieties will go extinct. Any that go extinct
" will take the fauna that have adapted to live alongside them down too.
" Higher temperatures & higher carbon levels have equated throughout the
" earth's entire history with more explosive life-creation and expansion.
"
" The lower temps and CO2 levels we have now mean intermittent ice ages,
" which kill everything; and a much slower pace of life arising and
" finding niches to exploit. Think of how much life you will find in an
" acre of rain forest vs how much you will find in Siberia.
this is the first i've heard of this argument; it has piqued my
curiosity. what's the source of data for [pre]historic co2 levels?
" >" And then there's the whole debate about food vs fuel. Is it better to
" >" use corn/soy crops for ethanol/diesel or to feed people?
" >
" >burning food as fuel is definitely stupid. they looked around for
" >something to run engines from and found alcohol brewed from
" >sugar/starch, and not pausing to consider food competition never mind
" >efficiency stopped looking. this has made adm very happy...
"
" I'm sure plenty of people are happy; not least among them the
" politicos who get votes for pushing environmentalists' latest hotfixes
" that don't work.
happiness, i would venture to say, that has everything to do with self
interest and nothing to do with national energy/economic policy.
" I have an enviro friend who advocated ethanol twenty years ago. Now
" that it's here, he complains about it.
he's finally seeing a downside that wasn't apparent when ethanol was
just a potential niche fuel. a similar now-hidden downside with
biodiesel is what to do with the massive glycerine byproduct amounts.
uses will be found for it; uses -must- be found for it.
" >cellulosic is much better on both counts; you can use any plant, and
" >nearly all of it instead of just the small fraction that is starch or
" >sugar. there's nothing comparable for biodlesel yet, but plants that
" >produce inedible oils are just starting to be investigated.
"
" Actually I'm not sure aither statement can hold up any more. The real
" solution for growing our way past "fanatic oil" is probably with algae
" production. Experimental algae farms are now wringing 60-70 times
" more useful plant mass than any other type of crop known. It can be
" inferred that algae grown in CO2-enriched air can yield oil that can
" be converted into biodiesel (and one plant is doing this now on a
" small scale). In addition, the system does not require fertile land
" or potable water.
"
" See: http://www.oakhavenpc.org/cultivating_algae.htm
i forgot about algae!
and if rising co2 is a problem, algae farms could be colocated with
smokestacks so that co2-rich emisisons could be routed directly into
the growth water.
" I think it likely that in 15-20 years, our economy will run on
" biodiesel. Better get that 232 ready!
this sounds to me like certainly the most sensible future, but
politicians and power interests don't always do what's sensible for
society at large.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin