My 74 Gremmy gets 30 Impg with 232 1bbl T-14 and 2.73:1 rear. That's about 25 per US gal. Ken Quoting Dan Strohl <DStrohl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > I get about 25 MPG +/- 2 or 3 from the 4.6-liter stroker in my '79 AMX. > I'm still fiddling with the MAP sensor voltage, so there may be some > improvement there. Of course, I'm driving it more for smiles than > mileage, so I tend to be a little heavy with the right foot. > > dan > > > Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:31:47 -0700 (PDT) > From: Jesse <j2sax@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx" <wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Rambler > AMC, > Nash, Jeep and family" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [AMC-list] Mileage with AMC/Jeep 4 Cyl 2.5 EFI or 4.0 in > an 80's AMC > Message-ID: > <1363797107.42934.YahooMailNeo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > That's good to know! ?I imagine the numbers in a Spirit might be even > better as they are a tad lighter and more aerodynamic. ? > > Then again, if a 4.0 could get 30, I wonder if an EFi'd 2.5 could get > closer to 36 or even 40? ?I know there is a point of diminishing returns > when a lack of power can translate into worse mileage for a smaller > engine, but as light as the Spirits are (and they can be made lighter) > It seems that like that would not be an issue. ? > > Either way, 30 is 50% better than he gets now! ? > > Have a great week,? > > Jesse > > > ________________________________ > From: wrambler242 <wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Jesse <j2sax@xxxxxxxxx>; "Rambler AMC, Nash, Jeep and family" > <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:59 AM > Subject: Re: [AMC-list] Mileage with AMC/Jeep 4 Cyl 2.5 EFI or 4.0 in an > 80's AMC > > > A properly setup 91-95 4.0L with a standard trans will get you knocking > on the 30mpg highway number in stock form. > > My American will get almost 29mpg with it's AMC T5, 3:31 axle and 60 > series tires on all 4 corners. A narrower tire and keeping your rpm > around 2000-2200 at highway speeds should get you at 30 + -. Lugging the > engine down to lower rpms will probably cost you mpg as will getting to > far above this window. A narrow low rolling resistant tire likely get my > American there if traveling on level ground and not all the hills and > winding roads around here. > > Slam it to the ground! Lower is better :-) keeps the air out from under > it. > _______________________________________________ > AMC-list mailing list > AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com > _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com