Thanks everyone for the thoughts. Completely my mistake in not checking heights and clearances. We did think about a scoop for about 30 seconds - but my idea (and my sons) is of a very stock grocery getter mobile. Bench seats, no air, no power windows, no power brakes, no power steering, no radio, no full cover hubcaps - but I did go crazy and opted for whitewalls. To me, the car is very cool - the only thing cooler would be a wagon. We'll check into low-profile dropped air filters. If we can make it work, we will. But at the absolute worst, we still have a good 1909 we put together from parts and rebuild kits. We just need to tune it a bit more (it was a little rich). More power would be cool, but either way, the car will be running and driving just fine. On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:43 PM, tom jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh damn, yeah, you can just about stand on top of the carb and close > the hood on the older rambler. OK i exaggerate... but i'm certain the > 64-up hood profile is MUCH lower. Sorry I didn't think of that. The > 58-63 Americans are very, very old/tall designs that accomodated the > old oil bath type filters too. > > There are filter canister apps for this sort of problem, that more or > less put the cover 1/2" over the top of the carb, and drop the filter > down low. > > A hood scoop would be cool, actually, if it fits with your vision of > the car. Or a bubble for clearance, rather than a scoop. > > Sounds like your kid is sharp though, to check assumptions like that. > > The manifold on the 232 is lower relative to the crankshaft > centerline; i think you stumbled onto one of those engine-design > features that few people think about, eg. how an engine design changes > to accomodate styling! The trough is well above the combustion > chamber. > > Damn, sorry if you end up scrapping it totally. > _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com