" From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> " " " Never saw a 3 speed auto with the Dakota V6. hmmm... were they all 4sp, or stick? when did mopar start using electronic autos? " The XJ/MJs saw the good 2.8 in the last month or so of production. " They came with zero balanced flexplates and Jeep used to have the " plate part number to go with crate motors swapped in. sweet! though the 3.4 crate longblock is now out of production... did any get manual trannies? i -think- an '87-up s10 2.8 flywheel would work. the camaro 2.8/3.4 won't; it's too thick. " Jim Blair, Lynnwood, WA '87 Comanche, '83 Jeep J10, '84 Jeep J10 " " From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker) " " " From: d stohler <das24rules@xxxxxxxxx> " " " " ok. i did check out the firewall on this one. it has a wide notch in " " the middle of it just like my 2 sx4's do where the back end of the " " head fits. the radiator sits way back also, could be reworked and " " moved forward. i DISPISE anything generic motors. LOL. if i go ahead " " and get this, and go with a 4.0 set up, i would be going for a 93-95 " " i think. entire wiring harness and all. the autos for those years " " still shift with a linkage/cable dont they? this pickemup would be " " for my mom. she needs something for winter supply trips for their " " c-store. they live 90 (one way)miles from the small town they get some " " stuff at, then alot of times, have to go 150 miles (one way) for the " " bigger bulk of stuff. she has a little escort sedan now. dont work so " " well. " " i think you need to compare this firewall to a later xj/mj to see if " you do indeed have the 4.0 notch, before going ahead with a 4.0 swap. " " as joe says, just putting another 60* v6 in would be easiest. nb. gm " redesigned the 2.8 for '87, with fixes for many of its ills, and also " making it internally balanced instead of externally, so you can't use " the existing flexplate without first removing its balance weights. " all 3.1 and 3.4 also are internal balance. going with a tbi or mpi " version should pick some mileage up and probably be more trouble free. " " i also think an xj 2.5 would be perfectly adequate for your parent's " grocery runs, and definitely an easier swap than a 4.0 if you don't " have the firewall notch - maybe easier even if you do, since it also " used a tf904/30rh/30re [except on '87-'93 xj, aw4] and you wouldn't " have to disturb the t/c. better mileage than a 4.0, by an mpg or 2. " " just for grins, another engine swap possibility is a dakota 3.9 v6, " preferably mpi as i hear the carbed are gas hogs. it's wide but they " put 318s and 360s in zjs... and its tf999 should slip right into the " place of your tf904. " " and also, if they're really packing the groceries in, i agree an xj " would suit them better than this mj. _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com