" From: Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx> " " It is the 2.8 (same one AMC used for a couple of years in the " Cherokees), 3.0, and 3.3 liter 60 degree V6's that have this problem. I " don't know if GM still uses this engine or not but to the best of my " knowledge, they never fixed the problem (this engine family has had lots " of problems from day 1). The whole intake manifold arrangement is just " stupid. Besides being bad for leaks, you also have to pull the push rods " to change the gaskets which adds to the cost of the repair. iirc the chev 60-deg family never had 3.0 or 3.3 members; it was stroked into a 3.1 then bored into a 3.4, then evolved into the current 3.5/3.9 'hi value' engine family, still pushrod. there was also the 3.4 twin-dual-cam/dohc, intended for the fiero but came out a year after it was cancelled. the 3.9 is up to 240 hp. the intake problem is b/c they're so narrow compared to a 90-deg engine; it would've been pretty near impossible to put a carb atop an intake squeezed between full-width heads and get good airflow or mixture distribution. it's possible the hi value engine rectifies this. there's an unrelated 60-deg aluminum ohc [dohc?] made in various sizes from 2.8 to 3.8, incl 3.0, 3.2, and 3.6, and it's used by alfa and now-independent saab, legacies of gm days. " The 3.8 liter 90 degree V6's (especially the 3800 Buick motor) are " pretty good V6's. The Chevy design 3.8 is I think a 305 with two " cylinders hacked off. It's not a true even fire design (even the so " called even fire one doesn't fire every 120 degree) which makes it run a " little rough. That issue seemed to be fixed when it grew into the 4.3 " liter V6. Dad's Astor (4.3 V6) was pushing 200,000 miles when he got rid " of it and it was still running strong. these are all derived from successful v8 designs, the 300/340/350 iron version of the aluminum buick 215 and the sbc. the buick was made in lots of sizes including a 3.0 and iirc 3.3. iirc the chev 229/3.8 crank was set to make each -bank- an even-firing 3, probably to aid even induction and scavenging. they have the advantage of room between the banks for the intake. curiously, the 2.8/hi-value family shares some dimensions with the sbc, bore centers and bearing diameters, and originally conrod lengths. i wouldn't be surprised to find deck heights were the same also. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com