" From: "William 'Chip' Lamb" <chip@xxxxxxxxxx> " " " >nash content: the 234.8 had shell insert bearings starting in '33-4, " >but the straight 8 had babbitt bearings like an older nash six, " >according to egge machine. i wouldn't be surprised if both were " >derivatives of that '20s design. " " Re Babbitted 8s - not by 1940 they did not. Couldn't have taken that " much longer to change over. The 8 was still on paper for '42 but the " number of 4280s produced must have been incredibly small if any. you're right about it going to '42, but egge shows 'rebabbitt 9 mains' the whole time and no cam bearings, though '34-'42 shows cb56 and cr860 for the conrod, and rod forging #25177 which is the same as the 234.8 '34-'49. just learned from their babbitt pg - it wasn't always poured directly into the block; sometimes a steel or bronze shell was used, making changeover to insert bearings much easier. " The 1940 and earlier OHV 6 engine had much more in common with its " forebears. Major revisions took place in 1941 and again in 1950. It's " probably fair to say that the 1950-later engine (bumped up to 252 " around that time) has a lot in common with the 232/258 for decades to come. likely true - but like the 172/184/196 it must've been a work in progress, and its design may have roots as far back as the '25 special 6. any way, this 8 would be the cool period-appropriate motor to have in one of those nash tow trucks... ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com