I have not been monitoring it, but I agree, the language in the ad is not encouraging. The seller sounds unclear and a bit erratic. Makes me wonder about the work too. ITS LIKE WHEN ITS AL CAPS AND BAD GRAMAR you start to wonder... The Typhoons are truly beautiful. The 63 and 64 classics too are real sleepers and are overlooked all the time. They have a great distillation of 60's styling, they were made at or near the peak of AMC quality, parts interchangability is great, and 64 gets the 232. A hardtop is just the cherry on top. The torque tube driveline is bulletproof, grossly overbuilt, not really that hard to work on except for it's sheer mass. Brakes, axle bearings etc are same as late model. It's light, around 3000 lbs +/- 100 (my wagon weighed 3150 on a scale). It's no sports car but it will ride great, and unlike a lot of other brand cars from that era, even though it handles sluggishly it doesn't do anything bad when pressed hard. The only tech I'd upgrade for daily use would be front brakes and a pertronix ignition, and maybe a Weber carb "jeep kit" if the carb was crapped up. Vacuum wipers are better than electric if both the pump and motor are in good shape. The front suspension struts are a PITA but 64 is easier than 63 (different diameter rods I think or was that 65). Did I say I think it's beautiful? There's no other downside to that car model. That particular car, I dunno... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/20100209/78868068/attachment.htm> _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com