Re: [AMC-list] Interesting item in A.M.C....
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AMC-list] Interesting item in A.M.C....
- From: wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:46:42 +0000
I was/ am under the impression that 64 till some time in 65 Americans did have a smaller taper.
Never had one apart to check.
The fix is to swap in 66-69 uprights as everything else is the same.
Anyone got a parts book handy?
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device from U.S. Cellular
-----Original Message-----
From: Wayne E Lamothe <superglider@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:25:32
To: <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] Interesting item in A.M.C....
Not sure of the 64 but that is what I did for my 66 and 69. I got a set
of ball joints for a 70 and just ground the tabs off and they bolted in
and worked perfect. matter of fact I had an old 83 Eagle ball joint that
I experimented on and it fit too after grinding off the tab. I have pics
somewhere on my photobucket site.
This is the Eagle ball joint in the lower control arm
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v105/Superglider/69%20Ambo/2009/?action
=view¤t=P1010100.jpg
The 70 unit bolt holes were identical after grinding off the tab. the
shaft size is the same for the 66, 69,70 and 83.
Wayne
Wayne & Lisa (Skeezix), Bolton Landing, NY
AMO#8454, http://www.superglider.thinkhost.com/
69 Ambo coupe, 401, M12, 66 Ambo 990 Wagon, 327,PW,PB,PS,posi,AM/FM,AC
2003 Harley FLHTCI, 2000 Jeep GC Limited 4.7
2001 Cherokee, 2002 Caddy Seville Northstar V8
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:03:34 -0800 tom jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Article about a 64 Classic:
>
> the Rambler lower ball joints are not easily available and ex-
> > pensive when you can find them. An easy fix is the later AMC
> > ball joint, which fits perfectly, only needing the tab for the
> > two extra mount bolts to be trimmed off.
> >
>
> ?!?!? Is this true?! I thought the tapered shaft was a different
> diameter?
> Smaller I think. THe tie rod end tapers are smaller in the newer
> parts,
> otherwise they're identical to 63-64.
>
> Suuure would be convenient!! The early lower ball joints are very
> expensive
> and hard to get.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
<http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/200
91222/c16edc93/attachment.htm>
> _______________________________________________
> AMC-list mailing list
> AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
>
>
____________________________________________________________
Weight Loss Program
Best Weight Loss Program - Click Here!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/c?cp=-sXU821u_uKnm2QF_xLyfQAAJ1CQK0_7rxp3pSy6Q8vfnlSeAAYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADNAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAEUgAAAAA=
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin