Re: [AMC-list] 727 vs. 999 converters ????
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AMC-list] 727 vs. 999 converters ????
- From: Lynn Howell <lynnhowlyn@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:18:50 -0700
From: Jim Shadwick <idahoamx@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "AMC, Rambler, Nash, Jeep and family" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] 727 vs. 999 converters ????
Message-ID: <4AC2E32B.8040900@xxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
The flex plate is the same....engine specific(ie; 304,360/401
etc).....the converters are different and will not interchange
.....
jim
Just to be clear - are we saying that if flex plates are "engine
specific" - that the 4.0 flex plate I have on the back end of my 258
in front of the 32RH trans (aka TF 999) shouldn't work? 'Cause it
seems to be working pretty well.
And yes - I know the 32RH is a lockup trans whereas "most" TF999's
aren't and I am using the appropriate lockup converter.
Thanks
Lynn in Vancouver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/20090930/1b3ec893/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin