" From: tom jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> " > " > " > what makes this confusing is that this is duraspark -II-. the briefly " > used duraspark -I- ['76? '75?] did -not- have an external coil " > resistance. the modules are very similar; i can't tell if they're " > actually the same or not. " " " [] " " There is no DESIGN difference in Duraspark I and II. At best, II had a " heftier transistor to drive the coil, but semiconductor technology has " improved so much since the 1970's that I wouldn't (and haven't) given it a " second thought. interesting. i don't know about the tfi coil, but the ds1 coil had lower primary resistance than the early ds2 coil. there are other variables like dwell though. " [] " " The HEI module is basically a duraspark box capable of driving a BIG coil. " It's sort of "80's" tech where the duraspark is "70's". except that hei came out in '75 and carried through the '80s essentially unchanged... " From: Jesse <j2sax@xxxxxxxxx> " " " [] " " So, will the extra 258 HEI I have drop into the 67 232 (with the " starter on the drvr side)? I just want to get it running a little " better so I can take some trips this Summer... maybe even do Cordova! i can tell you for a fact my '68 199 is running one. it could stand to be recurved, but it's run flawlessly otherwise, even before i bypassed the resistance wire. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list