Re: [Amc-list] VAM on 'the prestigious internet' site
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] VAM on 'the prestigious internet' site
- From: Wrambler <wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:20:13 +0000 (UTC)
I kept my grumble short...
:)
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV 26508
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
"I realize that death is inevitable.
I just don't want to be around when it happens!"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Victor the Cleaner" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eddie Stakes" <eddiestakes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 5:18:30 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] VAM on 'the prestigious internet' site
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:41:15PM -0500, Eddie Stakes wrote:
> Hi Jonathan, no, I don't want a wikipedia account, nor have a intention of
> ever wanting one. I don't have time to straighten it out, best leave that to
> VAM 'experts' of which I am not one. But due to crap like wikipedia is why
> we have stuff out there like the new Hot Wheels 71 AMX. While the details
> and the car are nice, on back it has 'born in: Auburn Hills, Michigan' and
> 'designer: Chrysler LLC' and 'specialty: big a big rear spoiler, fender
> bulges and optional denim interior, this muscle car was made for straight
> line performance'
>
> My point is simple: if someone had bothered to simply do a little research
> instead of relying of some fool blogging on wiki (I don't know what Mattel's
> problem was, but guess is that they found erroneous information off a
> website; maybe wikipedia!) but it now takes years of undoing what one now
> sees on back of Mattel's new Hot Wheels 71 AMX, as anyone who buys one, and
> don't really know.....will always assume that Mopar made the 71 AMX 'because
> they saw it on back of toy car box (or pick one: wikipedia, allpar, Mopar
> website ect).
>
> Griping about it here is good therapy and maybe, just maybe, some folks who
> have more time on their hands will either comment in that goofy blog, and
> get stuff straight, or even write Mattel to ask them to simply please get
> facts straight on back of toy box. On the latter....Mattel had a 69 AMX that
> you can sometimes find on ebay, and it came out in I believe 2001. Same
> deal, "made by Chrysler" and many people called and emailed to no avail. 8+
> years later, we get nice Hot Wheels car, but same misinformation on back.
> Which is the gist of my original post. And as time goes on, all out cars
> will be 'made by mopar' and more and more diluted stuff on wikipedia and
> allpar about AMC, nothing more. It might be why no one ever commented in
> that 'prestigious internet' blog spot, just sort of blew it off as allpar
> for the course.
Whatever. All I'm going to do it point out that creating a wikipedia
account and correcting the offending entry (or entries) would have taken
you less time and typing than the above rant.
jl
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin