So, Basically you don't have any real reasons for not liking the 91-95. That's what I thought... * Absolutely. Those are all reasons that really make zero difference for someone who wants to put a 4.0L in and drive the car. * I said as much - and quote:] "I'd guess that as a DD running unloaded in a light car - it would be ok - but again, Chrysler kept adding back ECM control to each ECM system used after the Renix." . Renix does indeed work well, when it works. * Clean Contacts are the key. It's now ancient science. * I'VE heard this said about the ODB I & II systems. All EFi is ancient science as it's been around awhile if time is the consideration. If it is functionality, the Renix is still ahead of the ODB I & II - only thing ever said is better is that the ODB systems retain data when shut off - so diagnosis is easier. The reasons why Chrysler did or did not do something with renix is also pointless. * Just filling in blanks Mark... ? Block design? More worthless info for a daily driver. None of these engines has actual problems related from block design changes. * If cylinder walls were egging due to casting weaknesses - they may still run ok with high mileage - but why spend the same amount of money buying into one of these when one can get a different year 4.0 with better design & materials ? Maybe some are noisier? Tell the guy with 300,000 miles on his 91-95 4.0L that it is a bad engine??? * Ambassador to AMC Swap Nation I am not - but recall , I did say that Chrysler would have not done any of these improvements if they weren't getting complaints - make sense ? He can put together a car from any 87-95 and make it run and drive. * And I could date Siamese Twins - doesn't make the odds of winning a Sack Race any better. If he wants to be able to learn to maintain it EASILY without a steep learning curve, custom ecu etc, The 91-95 is that system. * Plug in the plugs into the sockets they go to - and where's the Beef ? Using the GM ECM - as it is such wide usage in JEEP builds - I wouldn't consider Custom. You know as well as anyone the Renix system requires you to learn how to work on it. * I upgraded my knowledge on EFi systems by readings on the Renix. The sectors of Engine Data the Renix covers to properly monitor the engine - is what is optimum for engine performance. The '91 - '95 systems don't take as many readings as many times - which is not the way it should be .. elewise - there wouldn't have been concurrent 'upgrades' to the OBD ECm's. You won't find many shops left that can scan a system, let alone work on one. * Like I'd want to pay $65.00 an hour to a Bubba shop - remember, I own AMC . In 5 years of ownership - one crank position sensor went out. The Islamic Auto Repair guy in town - barely speaks intelligible inglish and knew the problem after a brief discussion. Parts in stock? Fuhgeddaboutit, maybe they can order them??? * Sure - try AutoZone . Get a better price than the Dealership and Waaaaaaaay faster. You are after perfection for your dream turbocharged all everything vehicle. * "Blown is Beautiful" - but I mentioned Turbo's in reference to the Renix Systems capabilities of handling differing load conditions - without Ping. He is just trying to make his wagon drivable and you point him away from the easiest system to buy install and use. * He'll pay the same amount of money for the better options - and I pointed him toward the better engines: Renix or '98 NVH And - advised him to get a Donor Cherokee - so he'll unplug the needed from one and plug them back in to the driver.. what could be simpler ? Give the guy a break and don't try to tell him to stay away from a system just because you don't think it is perfect for YOUR needs. * Excuuuuuuuuuuse me while I take a Pill Break.... there..... I feel Much better now. T. Mark Price Morgantown, WV 26508 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list