Thanks, Joe and Todd, for your input.Anyone else with bumper/plating experience?> > A '68 AMX accident-free front bumper was recently > acquired from an allegedly reputable AMC source and was sent > out for re-chroming--the old bumper was unusable and was > trashed (trust me, it was unusable). The newly acquired > bumper was guaranteed uninvolved in an accident or bent. > The newly plated bumper came back and didn't fit the > front of the vehicle by two inches (I believe it was the top > of the bumper that was the issue)! Again, the bumper seller > claimed the bumper was in "excellent used > condition." I was told by the bumper seller that the > plating shop didn't do its duty in "blocking" > the bumper before replating and checking the fitment of the > bumper prior. The bumper seller also claims that plating > shops have "forms" or "molds" that > bumpers can fit into and thus the plating shop can check the > straightness of the bumper before replating. The bumper > seller claims that no two AMX bumpers are alike and if > switching one AMX bumper to another AMX, this > "blocking" procedur > e must always be done to ensure good fitment. The body > shop claims that the bumper seller gave them a bumper that > was off by two inches due to a bumper accident, although > upon intial inspection before replating, the bumper appeared > to be accident-free, with no apparent "witness > marks.." The body shop has never heard of > "blocking" a bumper before replating and > didn't test fit the new bumper prior to replating. The > plating shop is closed for the weekend. What are the > facts/fallacies of this situation? Who's to blame? > Who's right? > > Thanks, > > Bumperless Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20090221/4b834e5f/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list