On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:13:51AM +0000, Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Is Classic Rock sad because of the music? Ah, I probably shouldn't have started this... I just think it's pathetic to define one's tastes so narrowly, and particularly to a window of Western pop music spanning about twenty years. That's like spending the rest of your life eating nothing but Chicken McNuggets. Don't get me wrong - I like a lot of Bonehead Rawk just fine, but there are a couple of thousand years of music from this culture *and* the rest of the world that lie outside the list of songs comprising the well-known "Classic Rock" canon that can be pretty thoroughly tabulated by a couple of people in a couple of hours. Stepping out of that little tiny bubble can change your life. I can play you music that'll bring tears to your eyes. Or make you so crazy mad that you'll put your fist through a door. Or just confuse you so badly you'll have to leave the room. If music has that kind of power, why on earth would you ever need to hear "Stairway to Heaven" *again*? The brain is a muscle that, like any other, atrophies with disuse. Keep pouring the same old crap into it, and not much interesting and new will come out - GIGO. > I don't actualy go out of the way to listen to "Classic Rock" mind you, > I just prefer songs that don't say Yo a lot.... I'm mostly with you there. I've got a strong aversion to hippity-hop. 25 or so years ago it represented a novel direction, but it's proven itself to be pretty much musically bankrupt - a real cultural dead-end. Main exceptions: Public Enemy, Ice-T/Body Count (the rap-metal thing kinda works for me). > Oh and that have actual music as their basis.... We could have quite a spirited discussion over what the prerequisites for "actual music" are. Curiously, the genre broadly known as "musique actuelle" would probably challenge your preconceptions. jl _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list