I doubt they would be intentional. If they placed them in the wrong rpm range it would create more issues, such as stumbles and surges, then it would fix. It would be almost impossible to guess what trans shift point an end user would have. I guess in Tom's case they could have a specific burn for Eagle station wagons. That would explain the differences going to his Hornet. If it was a packaged ecm for say a combo with an aw4 they could write for that. I wonder if those spikes have always been there or if the programming is getting corrupted? Who knows how many servers they have been through or even how they store the programming. They may make good money off of rewrites so they send out a unit that runs the car with no frills. Then custom burn later? -- Mark Price Morgantown, WV 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II " I realize that death is inevitable. I just don't want to be around when it happens! " -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Todd Tomason <jayscore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > On Wednesday 19 November 2008 12:08, Tom Jennings wrote: > > I went back and looked more carefully at the tables in the originla > > Howell EPROM, and they're not that good. There's funny peaks here and > > there that to me, now, look like mistakes. > > That sure makes you wonder, though. Could the peaks be intentional, to > compensate for something? Maybe shift points or something like that? > > Todd > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list