"Dan Strohl" <DStrohl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said: >Not to go OT away from AMC, but I'd always read that GM designed the >Monza to take the rotary, then when they couldn't get the rotary >approved, continued on with the Monza just as AMC continued on with the >Pacer, thus the overlap of the Monza and the Vega in the market for a >couple of years. That's actually correct. However, the Monza was intended mostly to be a futuristic-looking skin wrapping the standard Vega platform, to make it look slick for the new Wankel engine. So much for great ideas. >I'd always read that the Citation was always intended >to appear just as it appeared - a FWD, conventional-engined replacement >for the RWD X-body (Nova, Phoenix/Ventura, Apollo, Omega). Yep. Unfortunately they were also rather poorly-planned replacements that never really lived up to the hype. The X-body was to compete with other FWD midsize cars like the Accord, Corona, and Cressida. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MARC MONTONI Richmond VA Cu vi parolas Esperanton? Freedom. Responsibility. www.LP.org I'd rather push a Rambler than drive a Toyota. Visit www.AMCRC.com or www.AMONational.com . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list