Frank, Greg and others. How will you know it's "doing as advertised" unless you have back to back IDENTICAL tests in a controlled environment??? I've read all the claims by "automotive breath" and others going back several years. For one thing I don't see how it could possibly help much if at all on a motor where (due to dished pistons or open type quench chamber) the piston to head clearance is .060 or greater. Smokey Unick claimed the benefits from a "quench type" chamber dropped off drastically once you reached that point. And yet I see pictures of these guys putting VERY small grooves in some of these heads and "claiming" HUGE gains,,,,, com-on now. At LEAST show me where someone has done Gtech tests or SOMETHING. I wish I was still working at the shop where we had a dyno or I'd do em. I don't currently have any engines ready to assemble that would be a good test. Anyway It's only about 6 weeks till the PRI show. I'll be asking everyone in sight about it. If anyone has any examples I'll try and get pictures. But HEY,,, that's just ME!!! Bruce Hevner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20081028/a74d2790/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list